:-(
A former member
Sorry TV Mercia, but much of what you have written is tosh.
Central News is now beating Midlands Today on a regular basis. Two or three share points ahead some nights, neck and neck other nights, despite being on air at the disadvantageous time of 1800 in Britain's biggest geographical TV region, and one of its busiest and most congested. The figures are rattling BBC Birmingham. They are clinging on well to hold their lead some nights, but it is very far from the chasm you're hoping for. Remember who led handsomely when the programmes went head-to-head?
You are entirely wrong in your example of 'School Reports' and 'Just the Job for Jo'. 'School Reports' were one of the first things Dan B introduced - shrewdly, given that they guarantee the viewing of thousands of friends and family from the school or community involved. The former predates the latter, wholly undermining your argument about declining quality or a softening of editorial standards. In recent months Central News have soundly beaten the BBC on the biggest breaking, hardest stories - the acquittal of Michael Shirley, the National Motorcycle Museum Fire (embarrassingly, the BBC's Lindsay Doyle sat on a settee talking about a story that had been aired live on ITV1 thirty minutes earlier) and the list, seriously, goes on.
In Eric Macinnes, Jonathan Ray, Mark Gough, Keith Wilkinson, Sandy Barton, Steve Keeling, Robin Powell and many more, Central have a senior, experienced and proud line up of news reporters, who just don't buy the assessment you advance of Central News. They are in TV News for the big stories, and this appetite is met, regularly. Luckily, they are also all expected to be good with people, and have a deft touch for softer stories, when required. I am confident that they simply do not accept your parody of the Central News agenda.
Your do rather cling to the notion that the globe is in some way hugely important. It isn't. Anoraks care. Viewers don't. Its significance, overall, is marginal. Live with it. Why do people watch Central News? Not for the globe, or font style, or anything like that. They watch for people, stories, personalities and issues important to them.
I'm not sure what you were on when you posted a bizarre soliloquy about Dan Barton's 'moral compass', but keep taking it, and keep posting. You make us smile like frisky nuns on creme de menthe.
Central News is now beating Midlands Today on a regular basis. Two or three share points ahead some nights, neck and neck other nights, despite being on air at the disadvantageous time of 1800 in Britain's biggest geographical TV region, and one of its busiest and most congested. The figures are rattling BBC Birmingham. They are clinging on well to hold their lead some nights, but it is very far from the chasm you're hoping for. Remember who led handsomely when the programmes went head-to-head?
You are entirely wrong in your example of 'School Reports' and 'Just the Job for Jo'. 'School Reports' were one of the first things Dan B introduced - shrewdly, given that they guarantee the viewing of thousands of friends and family from the school or community involved. The former predates the latter, wholly undermining your argument about declining quality or a softening of editorial standards. In recent months Central News have soundly beaten the BBC on the biggest breaking, hardest stories - the acquittal of Michael Shirley, the National Motorcycle Museum Fire (embarrassingly, the BBC's Lindsay Doyle sat on a settee talking about a story that had been aired live on ITV1 thirty minutes earlier) and the list, seriously, goes on.
In Eric Macinnes, Jonathan Ray, Mark Gough, Keith Wilkinson, Sandy Barton, Steve Keeling, Robin Powell and many more, Central have a senior, experienced and proud line up of news reporters, who just don't buy the assessment you advance of Central News. They are in TV News for the big stories, and this appetite is met, regularly. Luckily, they are also all expected to be good with people, and have a deft touch for softer stories, when required. I am confident that they simply do not accept your parody of the Central News agenda.
Your do rather cling to the notion that the globe is in some way hugely important. It isn't. Anoraks care. Viewers don't. Its significance, overall, is marginal. Live with it. Why do people watch Central News? Not for the globe, or font style, or anything like that. They watch for people, stories, personalities and issues important to them.
I'm not sure what you were on when you posted a bizarre soliloquy about Dan Barton's 'moral compass', but keep taking it, and keep posting. You make us smile like frisky nuns on creme de menthe.