JO
I was going to ask why they did that too. Looking at the Flickr set, you get a sense of just how much infrastructure went in to support the main 'studio'. I kept thinking 'and this was just for a few weeks!'
But why replicate those costs/efforts on the other side of the park? (I know that they probably weren't quite as complicated over there.) Wouldn't it be better to add another studio at the same site (economies of scale) or as suggested above, use the normal studio?
I know this was a time of great extravagance for the BBC, but it still seems like the least logical option.
But why replicate those costs/efforts on the other side of the park? (I know that they probably weren't quite as complicated over there.) Wouldn't it be better to add another studio at the same site (economies of scale) or as suggested above, use the normal studio?
I know this was a time of great extravagance for the BBC, but it still seems like the least logical option.



































