RK
It's more an observation of Pier's highly selective reporting of ratings, and that they usually lack context/comparison. From some of his tweets you'd be mistaken for thinking that GMB was beating Breakfast in the ratings.
I hate these highly selective ratings figures. The local news stations in the US do it all the time. There was one where the anchors were holding their index finger up and saying “thank you for making us #1”. However there’s no fine print. One station does include fine print that could claim total victory is that they win both total households share and the key demo 25-54 share.
I remember back in the 90s when we would get a couple of different newspapers on a Sunday in our house, it was always entertaining how several of them would devote a good quarter of page 2 boasting about their circulation figures. It was all x% increase, x% of a certain age group - never just the raw numbers though.
Anyone would think Piers had a background in this sort of thing...
Anyone would think Piers had a background in this sort of thing...
Are you suggesting though that they can’t mention big ratings if they aren’t the normal ratings?
It's more an observation of Pier's highly selective reporting of ratings, and that they usually lack context/comparison. From some of his tweets you'd be mistaken for thinking that GMB was beating Breakfast in the ratings.
I hate these highly selective ratings figures. The local news stations in the US do it all the time. There was one where the anchors were holding their index finger up and saying “thank you for making us #1”. However there’s no fine print. One station does include fine print that could claim total victory is that they win both total households share and the key demo 25-54 share.