NG
Since you brought up frame rate does the BBC run all their cameras in 50i?
Answered elsewhere
Don’t current cameras allow you to choose frame rate so say photogs in North America (and South Korea) and the bureaus shoot in 50i instead of the typical 59.94 in those regions?
Yes most modern cameras allow 50/59.94 switching - a huge benefit since the HDTV standards chose common 1920x1080 and 1280x720 image standards across all frame rates. (SD cameras were region specific usually because of the fixed 480 or 576 line sensor size)
However it still makes sense to run your local bureaux at local frame rates, as I mention elsewhere.
Curious as if the conversion to 50i and back to 59.94 for North America would degrade the picture quality?
Short answer = yes. And BBC News don't use particularly high-end converters either.
For non-News live sources the BBC will use motion compensating Snell/SAM Alchemists or For.A FRC8000s or similar. These are as close to transparent as you get in conversion terms, and are mandated for UK DPP tech specs.
For News live sources BBC News use lower cost conversion - more in the motion adaptive field (which wouldn't be acceptable under DPP) Not Teranex-bad - but not Alchemist-good...
For file-delivered News content a software based route is often used I believe. This may use ffmpeg/ffmbc which the BBC added previously patented frame rate conversion algorithms to (alongside the formerly patented Weston 3-field deinterlacer) which is also quite limited (but very low cost...)
For higher quality file conversion of non-News content, there are Alchemist software solutions (even an on-demand cloud solution) these days.
And if they don’t shoot 50i but the 59.94 what does the conversion the vision mixer or another device.
Another device (usually costing a lot of money) - such as a PhC Alchemist.
Broadcast vision mixers wouldn't have standards conversion built in and only accept sources at their native frame rate. Some of the low-end Blackmagic stuff can accept other frame rates but the conversion is almost always junk. (Good standards onversion introduces a number of frames of vision delay that has to be compensated for too)
noggin
Founding member
Since you brought up frame rate does the BBC run all their cameras in 50i?
Answered elsewhere
Quote:
Don’t current cameras allow you to choose frame rate so say photogs in North America (and South Korea) and the bureaus shoot in 50i instead of the typical 59.94 in those regions?
Yes most modern cameras allow 50/59.94 switching - a huge benefit since the HDTV standards chose common 1920x1080 and 1280x720 image standards across all frame rates. (SD cameras were region specific usually because of the fixed 480 or 576 line sensor size)
However it still makes sense to run your local bureaux at local frame rates, as I mention elsewhere.
Quote:
Curious as if the conversion to 50i and back to 59.94 for North America would degrade the picture quality?
Short answer = yes. And BBC News don't use particularly high-end converters either.
For non-News live sources the BBC will use motion compensating Snell/SAM Alchemists or For.A FRC8000s or similar. These are as close to transparent as you get in conversion terms, and are mandated for UK DPP tech specs.
For News live sources BBC News use lower cost conversion - more in the motion adaptive field (which wouldn't be acceptable under DPP) Not Teranex-bad - but not Alchemist-good...
For file-delivered News content a software based route is often used I believe. This may use ffmpeg/ffmbc which the BBC added previously patented frame rate conversion algorithms to (alongside the formerly patented Weston 3-field deinterlacer) which is also quite limited (but very low cost...)
For higher quality file conversion of non-News content, there are Alchemist software solutions (even an on-demand cloud solution) these days.
Quote:
And if they don’t shoot 50i but the 59.94 what does the conversion the vision mixer or another device.
Another device (usually costing a lot of money) - such as a PhC Alchemist.
Broadcast vision mixers wouldn't have standards conversion built in and only accept sources at their native frame rate. Some of the low-end Blackmagic stuff can accept other frame rates but the conversion is almost always junk. (Good standards onversion introduces a number of frames of vision delay that has to be compensated for too)
Last edited by noggin on 6 January 2019 1:06pm - 3 times in total