JE
The T&Cs also clearly state that "Big Brother Can Change the Rules at anytime" - though it was always going to be more difficult for them to apply this to the voting public rather than just the housemates
Well if they can change the rules any time they want, whats the point in them having rules at all?
I dont care about spending money to vote someone out who is then put back in (I didnt even vote Nikki out or back in anyway) but when someone is evicted I think they shouldnt be eligible to win the prize money.
Not like Channel 4 would have let Nikki or indeed any of her fellow ex housemates who went back in win - we know who their winner always was
Yep. It was predictable for day one that Pete would win.
Jez
Founding member
cdukjunkie posted:
Jez posted:
Brekkie Boy posted:
Neil Jones posted:
Their decision was that it said on Channel 4's website that once a housemate has been evicted, they forfeit all right to the prize money. Therefore changing editorial direction in the way they did without changing the T&C's on the website meant it was in breach.
The T&Cs also clearly state that "Big Brother Can Change the Rules at anytime" - though it was always going to be more difficult for them to apply this to the voting public rather than just the housemates
Well if they can change the rules any time they want, whats the point in them having rules at all?
I dont care about spending money to vote someone out who is then put back in (I didnt even vote Nikki out or back in anyway) but when someone is evicted I think they shouldnt be eligible to win the prize money.
Not like Channel 4 would have let Nikki or indeed any of her fellow ex housemates who went back in win - we know who their winner always was
Yep. It was predictable for day one that Pete would win.