IS
I was very sceptical about it too, then I went to work for an HD tv channel and I've been converted to it (although for a while the onl way I could watch something in HD was on a monitor about 10cm by 7cm!).
However I only ever watch it on high end broadcast quality monitors, I've been very disappointed with seeing HD demostrated on domestic sets (mind you these were in shops)
However, Ultra HD is already said to be in development where the picture quality is something like 16 times better than standard HD!
Wasn't there a new qudio format once that had quality so good it even reproduced sounds that couldn't be heard by the human ear!?
Brekkie Boy posted:
The thing with HD is how clear do we really need our pictures.
I'm pretty satisfied with the digital quality I've got now - but as they say it's not until you see the difference that you notice it!
I'm pretty satisfied with the digital quality I've got now - but as they say it's not until you see the difference that you notice it!
I was very sceptical about it too, then I went to work for an HD tv channel and I've been converted to it (although for a while the onl way I could watch something in HD was on a monitor about 10cm by 7cm!).
However I only ever watch it on high end broadcast quality monitors, I've been very disappointed with seeing HD demostrated on domestic sets (mind you these were in shops)
Quote:
However, Ultra HD is already said to be in development where the picture quality is something like 16 times better than standard HD!
Wasn't there a new qudio format once that had quality so good it even reproduced sounds that couldn't be heard by the human ear!?