NG
It was put out to tender but according to the book "Channel 4: The Early Years and the Jeremy Isaacs Legacy"
By Dorothy Hobson, the contract was given to ITN under pressure from the IBA and Parliament - because Channel 4 News was to be taken in a different direction to ITV, lots of people though taking ITN was the worst possible idea, including the board of Channel 4.
How would taking ITN as the news contractor for Channel 4 prevent Channel 4 News from being taken in a different direction?
I believe the worry was that ITN - which was essentially at that point a company purely designed to make news for ITV - would run Channel Four News in a similar manner to their news output for ITV, and that it would be difficult to be culturally different when you were a small division in a larger organisation.
There was also a worry that Channel Four News would always be a poor relation in resourcing terms.
noggin
Founding member
It was put out to tender but according to the book "Channel 4: The Early Years and the Jeremy Isaacs Legacy"
By Dorothy Hobson, the contract was given to ITN under pressure from the IBA and Parliament - because Channel 4 News was to be taken in a different direction to ITV, lots of people though taking ITN was the worst possible idea, including the board of Channel 4.
How would taking ITN as the news contractor for Channel 4 prevent Channel 4 News from being taken in a different direction?
I believe the worry was that ITN - which was essentially at that point a company purely designed to make news for ITV - would run Channel Four News in a similar manner to their news output for ITV, and that it would be difficult to be culturally different when you were a small division in a larger organisation.
There was also a worry that Channel Four News would always be a poor relation in resourcing terms.