Back when this original ident was created, it was cutting edge or at the very least it was at the limits of what money and resources could provide. Nowadays such an effect is just.....meh. It's not a "new" logo, it's a re-creation of an old one with some rather poor keying and a horribly unrealistic background. And why use your name? If it's a vanity project for a YT channel, fair enough and good luck to you, but why post it here claiming it to be a Thames logo? It isn't, no more than the TVF logo this past week has been an ITV logo.
Two things to think about:
1) What WOULD a Thames TV logo / ident look like today? Maybe take inspiration from or seek to improve upon the actual current Thames TV Productions logo, which leaves a lot to be desired and is crying out for someone to rescue it.
2) Ident re-creations are great - we like them. At least, I do, and I prefer them to godawful studio sets or GMB or BBC News mocks. But for it to be a re-creation, it must capture the essence of what made the ident great in the first place. You've used the wrong font (Arial? Really?!), put in a background that wouldn't look out of place on a bad remaster of Blake's 7, used a poor water ripple effect that just makes me seasick, and your choice of pictures for your montage leave a lot to be desired - where have Tower Bridge's cables gone? Plus the building on the far left is obviously in daytime lighting. This wouldn't be seen on London Live, let alone the ITV weekday franchise.
Look at this and think how you could apply it to yours.