BR
If they repost it they risk committing libel themselves and implicating this site.
Anyone capture the C4 report?
If they repost it they risk committing libel themselves and implicating this site.
DV
Yes, that's the reason why I did not rip it from the Daily Mail site and post it anywhere myself although Simon Israel has retweeted someone else (who describes themself as Twitter Editorial) who posted the retraction on twitter.: https://twitter.com/gordonmacmillan/status/844635695264227329 (deliberartely not embedded)
Also, note:
Also, note:
Worth noting that the name of the attacker was rebroadcast on the +1 @Channel4News repeat before being pulled (as it was top of headlines)
— Chris Stokel-Walker ~ @stokel@infosec.exchange (@stokel) March 22, 2017
Last edited by dvboy on 22 March 2017 8:42pm
JO
Wait, what? Since when was Bake Off related to Westminster?
BREAKING: Channel 4 selling 'Bake Off' to highest bidder to cover legal fees.
Wait, what? Since when was Bake Off related to Westminster?
YG
That deserves a topic of its own, mate
BREAKING: Channel 4 selling 'Bake Off' to highest bidder to cover legal fees.
That deserves a topic of its own, mate
TM
Like how they instantly deflect the blame on to their correspondent.
Gutless. This is a great lesson as to why you should never report anything in a situation like this unless it has been verified by a direct source.
Statement from Channel 4 News pic.twitter.com/34QLcQasLI
— Hayley Barlow (@Hayley_Barlow) March 22, 2017
Like how they instantly deflect the blame on to their correspondent.
Gutless. This is a great lesson as to why you should never report anything in a situation like this unless it has been verified by a direct source.